I’m back! No really. A wise woman pointed out to me today that there was no better time than the present to blog (again) . So here I am.
Today’s entry builds off a quote that I read on the interwebs that was attributed to the late great Gore Vidal. It went something along the lines of “Statistics show that 50% of Americans don’t read and that 50% of Americans don’t vote. I can only hope that they’re the same 50%….” Clearly that’s not verbatim, but you get the gist. (I don’t know much about the man, but I doubt he was as heavily prone to ellipses as I am. A habit I’m working on breaking. But I digress…. Whoops.)
Pair this with the principle of “cognitive dissonance,” another little gem I stumbled upon last week while discussing a controversy that’s been playing itself out in my little corner of the world. Cognitive dissonance, if I understand it correctly, suggests that people will generally willfully disregard factual evidence (is that redundant?) that contradicts a belief that they have already formed.
People are so hard wired to hold on to their beliefs, come hell or high water, that they will willfully twist the data presented to them to support those beliefs; they will even ignore any information that can’t be distorted for their own purposes. Apparently, it’s not impossible for beliefs to change, but it’s pretty darned difficult. The most effective catalysts for changing beliefs typically come from trusted individuals from within the same circle. That is, when others who share your beliefs question those beliefs (I need to find a new word for “beliefs” now, don’t I? Where’s that damned thesaurus?), you are more likely to really re-evaluate.
Which brings me back to me. (Because this is my space to work my shit out, after all…) I have thought for some time that my “one the one hand … but on the other hand … but on the other hand” approach to understanding any issue has the possible negative effect of making me appear kind of wishy-washy on most topics. But on the other hand (see what I did there?) it has also allowed me to have what I consider to be a more thoughtful and well rounded understanding on most issues. I have to say though (on the other hand) that the whole process is time consuming and really quite exhausting. And given that there are only so many hours in the day, I rarely feel like I’m able to keep up on all the news that I really ought to be keeping up on.
So, Mr. Vidal, I do read (as much as I can, when I’m not busy checking out the important news on gofugyourself). But I feel woefully under-informed, nonetheless. And I do vote. But what I do best, I think, is try to listen to others, both those who appear to agree with what I think I believe, and those thoughtful, knowledgeable, and articulate individuals who do not.
Someone said to me today that they think the whole concept that “everyone has a right to an opinion” is a load of bull hockey. They suggested, instead, that everyone should have the right to an informed opinion, which I get is a slippery slope, and yet, I kind of agree.
I’m not suggesting that everyone has to agree on everything. What fun would that be? I love that there are really smart people out there who think differently than I do. I love learning more about how they see the world. What I have less and less patience for, these days, is the volume at which the uninformed feel compelled to broadcast their opinion.
And that is all I have to say about that today.
(Oy. A bit of a clunky first post after so long, but bare with me. I’ll figure out how all this works again once I get back into my groove.)


